USA v. Estate of Betty L. Curry et al
| USA |
| Unknown Heirs and Legatees of Betty L. Curry, Estate of Georgia L. Curry, State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Unknown Heirs and Legatees of Georgia L. Curry, Calvary Portfolio Services, LLC, Estate of Betty L. Curry and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
| 3:2020cv01005 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC,and State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. (trb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Stephen P. McGlynn for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 20-1005-SPM. (rah)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: USA. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-1005-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 10/23/2020. (rah) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam E. Hanna on behalf of USA (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE by USA (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calvary Portfolio Services, LLC, Estate of Betty L. Curry, Estate of Georgia L. Curry, State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Unknown Heirs and Legatees of Betty L. Curry, Unknown Heirs and Legatees of Georgia L. Curry, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanna, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
