Doolin v. St. Clair County Jail et al
| Harold E. Doolin, Jr. |
| C/O Purnell, St. Clair County Jail, C/O Reed, C/O Miller, C/O Smith, C/O Johnson, C/O Gummber, C/O Mosley and C/O Everett |
| 3:2020cv01225 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to RE-FILE the #1 Complaint as the First Amended Complaint and the #2 IFP motion as Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in Doolin, Jr. v. Unknown Defendant, No. 20-cv-01123-JPG (S.D. Ill. 2020). The Clerk is further DIRECTED to TERMINATE the pending #2 IFP Motion herein and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. No filing fee is assessed for this action. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/12/2020. (jsy)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 20-1225-JPG. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/10/2020. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Harold E. Doolin, Jr. (jaj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Harold E. Doolin, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Plaintiff)(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
