Shumway v. Rangmahol, Inc.
Janis Shumway |
Rangmahol, Inc. an Illinois Corporation doing business as Travelers Inn Motel |
3:2020cv01294 |
December 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
David W Dugan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
1 U.S.C. ยง 102 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 30 DAY ORDER. Having been advised by counsel (Notice of Settlement at Doc. 10) that the parties have settled the above-captioned action in its entirety and that they need 30 days to finalize settlement documents, the undersigned DIRECTS the Clerk of Court, 30 days after this Order is docketed, to ENTER JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, unless otherwise provided in the settlement documents. If the parties fail to finalize the settlement within the 30-day period, they may -- before that period expires -- move to postpone entry of judgment. Due to the settlement, the Court CANCELS all settings herein. Responses due by 3/4/2021. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/28/2021. (dmw2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Janis Shumway (Corkill, Kimberly) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Plaintiff filed her Motion for Entry of Default on January 20, 2021 (Doc. 8). A review of the return of service (Doc. 7) reveals that an individual by the name of Kanubhai Hathibhai was served on December 11, 2020. However, Kanubhai Hathibhai's connection to the Defendant corporation is unclear. Therefore, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to provide additional support to the Court by January 28, 2021, detailing how the individual served is someone on whom service can properly be effected on behalf of the Defendant corporation. (Action due by 1/28/2021). Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/21/2021. (arm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 8 MOTION for Entry of Default by Janis Shumway. (Corkill, Kimberly) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janis Shumway. Rangmahol, Inc. served on 12/11/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Corkill, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Rangmahol, Inc., and returned to Attorney Corkill for service. (kls3) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 20-1294-DWD. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 4 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Corkill, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Janis Shumway. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-1294-MAB. Consent due by 12/28/2020 (amv) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly A. Corkill on behalf of Janis Shumway (Corkill, Kimberly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rangmahol, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4349116.), filed by Janis Shumway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Corkill, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shumway v. Rangmahol, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rangmahol, Inc. an Illinois Corporation doing business as Travelers Inn Motel | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janis Shumway | |
Represented By: | Kimberly A. Corkill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.