Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Kellerman et al
| Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| Kenneth Kellerman, Buecher Clarissa and Clarissa Buecher |
| 3:2020cv01301 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY: Disputes which require a ruling on a motion made under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be handled in the following manner. The party seeking a discovery order shall request a prompt telephone conference with Judge Daly and opposing counsel by alerting the law clerk assigned to the case and providing the law clerk with appropriate material, such as: (1) a list or summary of the items in dispute, (2) copies of written requests/objections/privilege logs in dispute, and (3) an estimate of the amount of time needed to present argument to the Court. Law clerks prefer to receive these materials through Judge Daly's email depository for proposed documents. Prior to seeking a telephone conference with Judge Daly, the parties must meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute informally. Argument on motions to compel discovery or for discovery sanctions shall be presented orally at the telephone conference. Written motions or legal memoranda will not be accepted unless specifically requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 2/4/2021. (jlm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 22 CJRA TRACK B assigned. Scheduling and Discovery Conference set for 2/25/2021 at 10:15 AM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. To join the conference call, the parties should call 888-273-3658. The access code is 1770924. The security code is 1301. The parties are to submit a Joint Report of Parties and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order using the form provided in the Local Rules, seven (7) days before the conference. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2022 at 1:30 PM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Bench Trial set for 2/8/2022 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly.(jlm) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 20-1301-RJD. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 20 FINAL CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (McDonald, Jerome) unsealed on 2/1/2021 (trb). |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant Kellerman shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 3/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/29/2021. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Kenneth Kellerman to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Kenneth Kellerman on 1/29/21. Consent due by 2/19/2021 (trb) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Kenneth Kellerman. (McDonald, Jerome) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jerome E. McDonald on behalf of Kenneth Kellerman (McDonald, Jerome) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, for Declaratory Judgment by Clarissa Buecher.(Kirkpatrick, Eric) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kirkpatrick, Eric) unsealed on 2/1/2021 (trb). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Clarissa Buecher to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Clarissa Buecher on 1/25/21. Consent due by 2/16/2021 (trb) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric W. Kirkpatrick on behalf of Clarissa Buecher (Kirkpatrick, Eric) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Shear, Steven)unsealed on 2/1/2021 (trb). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 1/6/2021 (kls3) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Clarissa Buecher and Kenneth Kellerman, summons returned to attorney Fencl for service. (trb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan, #6 Summons Requested. Notice of Appearance and submitted summonses are fillable documents. Fillable documents should be converted to non-fillable PDF before filing on CM/ECF. This Notice is sent for informational purposes only. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn F. Fencl on behalf of Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan (Fencl, Glenn) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Shear, Steven) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Shear on behalf of Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan (Shear, Steven) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Shear does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-1301-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 12/28/2020 (trb) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet (Shear, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4350253.), filed by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Certified Policy)(Shear, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
