Dunnivan v. White
Travis Dunnivan |
Jesse White |
3:2020cv01309 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Federal Employer's Liability |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #5 Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense; denying #6 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/19/2021. (dhg) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (ack) |
Filing 7 NOTICE: Travis Dunnivan was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Travis Dunnivan shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 1/6/2021 (tba) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Travis Dunnivan. (ack) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense (ack) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Dunnivan. (ack) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Jesse White, filed by Travis Dunnivan.(ack) |
Filing 2 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Travis Dunnivan to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Travis Dunnivan on 12/8/2020. Consent due by 12/29/2020 (ack) |
Filing 1 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:20-cv-01309-NJR Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (ack) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dunnivan v. White | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Travis Dunnivan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jesse White | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.