Stauffer v. Pathfinder Software, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Madisyn Stauffer
Defendant: Pathfinder Software, LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software, Pathfinder Software, LLC doing business as Centeredge Software, LLC and Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC
Case Number: 3:2020cv01332
Filed: December 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mark A Beatty
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Filing 29 MOTION to Remand and Incorporated Memorandum in Support by Madisyn Stauffer. Responses due by 2/16/2021 (Green, Kevin)
January 7, 2021 Filing 28 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 20-1332-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 6, 2021 Filing 27 FINAL CONSENT TO TRIAL BY U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Wolf, Thomas) Modified on 1/7/2021 (lmb).
January 6, 2021 Filing 26 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Pathfinder Software, LLC to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Pathfinder Software, LLC on 1/6/21. Consent due by 1/27/2021 (lmb)
January 6, 2021 Filing 25 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Insler, Charles)
January 6, 2021 Filing 24 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #19 Notice (Other) filed by Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC. Incorrect event used. Filer must refile using correct event (Civil> Other Filings> Other Documents> Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge. (lmb)
January 6, 2021 Filing 23 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Green, Kevin)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #20 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Thomas M. Wolf on behalf of Pathfinder Software, LLC; granting #21 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Josh M. Kanthrow on behalf of Pathfinder Software, LLC. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 5, 2021 Filing 21 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Josh M. Kantrow $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-4370326 by on behalf of Pathfinder Software, LLC. (Kantrow, Josh)
January 5, 2021 Filing 20 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Thomas M. Wolf $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-4370318 by on behalf of Pathfinder Software, LLC. (Wolf, Thomas)
January 5, 2021 Filing 19 ENTRY STRICKEN: NOTICE by Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC re #18 Notice Extending Consent Deadline,,, Re Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and Consent/Non-Consent Form (Insler, Charles) Modified on 1/6/2021 (lmb).
January 5, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE: Madisyn Stauffer, Pathfinder Software LLC, and Innovative Heights Fairview Heights LLC was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Madisyn Stauffer, Pathfinder Software LLC, and Innovative Heights Fairview Heights LLC shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 1/12/2021 (tba)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING #16 Consent Motion to Stay. Plaintiff, with Defendant Pathfinder's consent, requests the Court to STAY her response to Defendant Pathfinder's Motion to Strike Class Allegations #11 until after the Court enters its Order on Plaintiff's forthcoming Motion to Remand. As Defendant Pathfinder does not object to this motion, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response to Defendant Pathfinder's motion to strike #11 shall be due 10 days after the Court enters its Order on the forthcoming motion to remand and subsequent briefing (should this case remain in this District). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 12/30/2020. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
December 21, 2020 Filing 16 Consent MOTION to Stay re #11 MOTION to Strike Pathfinder Software, LLC's Motion to Strike the Centeredge Class Allegations by Madisyn Stauffer. (Cornfeld, Richard)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This matter comes before the Court for case management. A review of the pleadings indicates that this case is related to a case assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. See Stuaffer v. Pathfinder Software, LLC et al, 20-46. Cognizant of the Seventh Circuit's position that related cases filed within the same U.S. District Court should be transferred to (or consolidated before) a single judge, see, e.g. Smith v. Check-N-Go of Illinois, Inc., 200 F.3d 511, 513 n.1 (7th Cir. 1999); Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc., 181 F.3d 832, 839 (7th Cir. 1999), the Court TRANSFERS this case to Magistrate Judge Beatty for further proceedings. All future pleadings shall contain cause number 20-1332-MAB. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 12/15/2020. (mjf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
December 14, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin P. Green on behalf of Madisyn Stauffer (Green, Kevin)
December 14, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Scott Levy on behalf of Madisyn Stauffer (Levy, Daniel)
December 14, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard S. Cornfeld on behalf of Madisyn Stauffer (Cornfeld, Richard)
December 14, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Strike Pathfinder Software, LLC's Motion to Strike the Centeredge Class Allegations by Pathfinder Software, LLC. (Mossman-Canfield, Kendall)
December 14, 2020 Filing 10 PathFinder Software, LLC's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint ANSWER to Complaint by Pathfinder Software, LLC.(Mossman-Canfield, Kendall)
December 14, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kendall J. Mossman-Canfield on behalf of Pathfinder Software, LLC (Mossman-Canfield, Kendall)
December 14, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Clair County, case number 19L0311 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4356305), filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC.(Mossman-Canfield, Kendall)
December 14, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC #3 Answer to Complaint filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC, #4 Motion to Strike filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC. Login used and signature do not match. Filer will re-file documents (special instruction related to Doc 1 Notice of Removal - filer need not refile any attachments, but only the Notice of Removal). (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
December 14, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACTION. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. All attorneys of record do not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
December 14, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC, Pathfinder Software, LLC, Madisyn Stauffer. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-1332-GCS. Consent due by 1/4/2021 (lmb)
December 11, 2020 Filing 4 ENTRY STRICKEN: MOTION to Strike by Pathfinder Software, LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software. (Mossman-Canfield, Kendall) Modified on 12/14/2020 (lmb).
December 11, 2020 Filing 3 ENTRY STRICKEN: ANSWER to Complaint by Pathfinder Software, LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software.(Mossman-Canfield, Kendall) Modified on 12/14/2020 (lmb).
December 11, 2020 Filing 2 ENTRY STRICKEN: NOTICE by Pathfinder Software, LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software (Mossman-Canfield, Kendall) Modified on 12/14/2020 (lmb).
December 11, 2020 Filing 1 ENTRY STRICKEN: NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County, case number 19 L 0311 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4355146), filed by Pathfinder Software, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mossman-Canfield, Kendall) Modified on 12/14/2020 (lmb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stauffer v. Pathfinder Software, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pathfinder Software, LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software
Represented By: Kendall J. Mossman-Canfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pathfinder Software, LLC doing business as Centeredge Software, LLC
Represented By: Kendall J. Mossman-Canfield
Represented By: Thomas M. Wolf
Represented By: Josh M. Kantrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC
Represented By: Charles Noah Insler
Represented By: Glenn E. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Madisyn Stauffer
Represented By: Kevin P. Green
Represented By: Daniel Scott Levy
Represented By: Richard S. Cornfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?