Shumway v. Old Town Hospitality LLC
| Janis Shumway |
| Old Town Hospitality LLC doing business as Sunset Motel |
| 3:2021cv00036 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 1 U.S.C. ยง 102 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. By motion dated March 5, 2021, Defendant Old Town Hospitality LLC requests a second extension of the deadline to answer Plaintiff's complaint because the parties are negotiating a settlement and hope to avoid significant litigation costs if an early agreement can be reached. Plaintiff has no objection to Defendant's motion. For good cause shown, Defendant's second motion for extension of time to file answer is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended through March 29, 2021. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 3/8/2021. (kll)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Old Town Hospitality LLC. (St. Clair, Clay) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown, Defendant's motion for extension of time to file answer is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 8, 2021. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/9/2021. (kll)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Old Town Hospitality LLC. (St. Clair, Clay) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Clay B. St. Clair on behalf of Old Town Hospitality LLC (St. Clair, Clay) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janis Shumway. Old Town Hospitality LLC served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. (Corkill, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Old Town Hospitality LLC. Original mailed to attorney Corkill for service. (ack) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-36-DWD. (ack)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Corkill, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Janis Shumway. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-36-MAB. Consent due by 2/3/2021 (ack) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly A. Corkill on behalf of Janis Shumway (Corkill, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Old Town Hospitality LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4375998.), filed by Janis Shumway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Corkill, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shumway v. Old Town Hospitality LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janis Shumway | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly A. Corkill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Old Town Hospitality LLC doing business as Sunset Motel | |
| Represented By: | Clay B. St. Clair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
