Brown v. Watson et al
Plaintiff: George Gannon, Arenzo Hoffman, Joseph Nickell, Keandre Hollins, Trevon Fenton, Andrew Kunkle, Cedric D. Allen, Andrew McKissick, Cortez Brown, Kevin McCreight, Ray Taylor, Joey Thomas and John Eglseder
Defendant: Richard Watson, Dr David Marcowitz and Trinity Service Group
Case Number: 3:2021cv00138
Filed: February 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: J Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to RICHARD WATSON, TRINITY SERVICE GROUP, and DR. MARCOWITZ on 4/6/2021. Waiver of Service due by 5/6/2021. (tjk)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 38 HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/6/2021. (kare)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER FOR SERVICE ON Defendants RICHARD WATSON, TRINITY SERVICE GROUP, and DR. MARCOWITZ. The Complaint, including COUNTS 1, 2, 3, and 4, survives screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Because one or more claims involve the alleged denial of medical care, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to ENTER the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the Complaint, and this Memorandum and Order to each Defendant's place of employment as identified by Plaintiff. The #34 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/5/2021. (jsy)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER: Andrew McCissick filed a #35 Response and notice of voluntarily dismissal of his complaint in this case and severed case no. 21-cv-160-JPG. McCissick has already been dismissed from this action. Therefore, the Court will enter a separate Order addressing his request for voluntary dismissal in case no. 21-cv-160-JPG. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/9/2021. (jsy) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 RESPONSE to opt out of this action. filed by Andrew McKissick. (kare)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Cortez Brown. (kare)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #12 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $23.83. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the St. Clair County Jail upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/23/2021. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Cortez Brown. (kare)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. #12 ), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 8/1/2020 to 2/9/2021 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at St. Clair County Jail. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 3/29/2021). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/11/2021. (tjk)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER SEVERING CASE. See attached Order for details. Each Plaintiff shall proceed with his claims in a separate suit. All #16 , #17 , #18 , #19 , #20 , #21 , #22 , #23 , #24 , #25 , #26 , #27 , and #28 Motions for Recruitment of Counsel are DISMISSED without prejudice. With the exception of Plaintiff Cortez Brown, all Plaintiffs are DISMISSED from this action, and their #4 , #5 , #6 , #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 , #11 , #13 , #14 , and #15 Motions for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis are TERMINATED. The only plaintiff remaining in this action is Plaintiff CORTEZ BROWN, and the Court will address his #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a separate order. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/11/2021. (jsy)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by George Gannon. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Cedric D. Allen. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Cortez Brown. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by John Eglseder. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Arenzo Hoffman. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Keandre Hollins. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Andrew Kunkle. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Kevin McCreight. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Andrew McKissick. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Joseph Nickell. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Ray Taylor. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Joey Thomas. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Trevon Fenton. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arenzo Hoffman. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew McKissick. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cedric D. Allen. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cortez Brown. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by George Gannon. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joey Thomas. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Eglseder. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Nickell. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keandre Hollins. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin McCreight. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ray Taylor. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trevon Fenton. (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiffs to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiffs on 02/09/2021. Consent due by 3/2/2021 (kare)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 21-138-JPG. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/9/2021. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit Declarations)(kare)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Watson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Gannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arenzo Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Nickell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keandre Hollins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevon Fenton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Kunkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedric D. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew McKissick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cortez Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin McCreight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joey Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Eglseder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr David Marcowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trinity Service Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?