McNeal et al v. Watson
Robert Sullivan, Terrence Wright, Roderick Whittaker, Morten Licker, Sr. Christopher McNeal, Alexander Garth, Joshua Householder, Delano Martin, Michael Mosley, Terrell Amerson, Jose A. Mejia-Gutierrez, Cameron Belk, Sr., Basilio Rosales-Cortez, Shawn LaFollette, Jestine Myers, Leonard Warren, Brandon Thrower, Demetrius Blue, Randy Miller, Randall Putman, Todd Willis, Paul Donley, Norman Tammons, Samuel Manzy, Jr., Randy Haley, Gloyd Stell, Amos Winters, Christopher Warlock, Steven R. Marshall, Kourtney Jackson and Christopher McNeal, Sr. |
Sheriff Richard Watson |
3:2021cv00139 |
February 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 NOTICE of Change of Address by Roderick Whittaker. (jaj) |
Filing 25 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10, 11 & 14 sent to Morten Licker (kare) |
Filing 24 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10, 11 & 14 sent to Randy Miller (ack) |
Filing 23 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10, 11 & 14 sent to Demetrius Blue (ack) |
Filing 22 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10 & 11 sent to Delano Martin. (jaj) |
Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10, 11 & 14 sent to Michael Mosley (jaj) |
Filing 20 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documetns 10, 11 & 14 sent to Terrence Wright (ack) |
Filing 19 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10, 11 and 14 sent to Todd Willis. (jaj) |
Filing 18 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 10 & 11 sent to Gloyd Stell. (jaj) |
Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Docs. 10, 11, and 14. Mail sent to Paul Donley (kare) |
Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Docs. 10, 11, and 14. Mail sent to Randy Haley (kare) |
Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Docs. 10, 11, and 14. Mail sent to Leonard Warren (amv) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's Order of March 2, 2021 (Doc. #10 ), Petitioners' #12 Motion to Intervene and #13 Motion to Remove are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/2/2021. (mlp) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remove Steven Marshall by Christopher McNeal, Sr. (jaj) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/2/2021. (mlp) |
Filing 10 ORDER: The #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED without prejudice. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/2/2021. (mlp) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Add Plaintiff and Intervene by Christopher McNeal, Sr. (jaj) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to Court of Updated Plaintiff Addresses by Christopher McNeal, Sr. (jaj) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT Supplement to #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (jaj) |
Filing 7 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 21-139-NJR. The following is important information concerning the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined the Court will review your petition to determine whether it survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in an Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you do not receive a preliminary review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel, it will not be considered until the Court has completed the preliminary review of your petition. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). In the event your petition survives the preliminary review, the Court will instruct the respondent to file a response to the petition and you will be notified of your deadline to file a reply. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/9/2021. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 MOTION to Alert U.S. Attorney by Christopher McNeal. (tjk) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Assign Special Counsel by Christopher McNeal. (tjk) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Bar by Christopher McNeal. (tjk) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Inform by Christopher McNeal. (tjk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher McNeal. (tjk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by All Plaintiffs.(tjk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.