Kizior v. Reynolds et al
Scott D Kizior |
Marilynn Reynolds, Etherton, C/O Baker, C/O Baxter and Williamson County Jail |
3:2021cv00196 |
February 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
J Phil Gilbert |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Marilynn Reynolds to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Marilynn Reynolds on 4/15/21. Consent due by 5/6/2021 (ack) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaclyn A. Kinkade on behalf of Marilynn Reynolds (Kinkade, Jaclyn) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Eric Neroda on behalf of Marilynn Reynolds (Neroda, Ronald) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Howard Weller on behalf of Marilynn Reynolds (Weller, Matthew) |
Filing 16 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Reynolds on 4/8/2021. Waiver of Service due by 5/10/2021. (tjk) |
Filing 15 HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/8/2021. (kare) |
Filing 14 ORDER FOR SERVICE on MARILYNN REYNOLDS. COUNTS 3 and 4 survive screening against MARILYNN REYNOLDS in her individual capacity. However, COUNTS 1 and 2 against WILLIAMSON COUNTY JAIL are dismissed with prejudice; COUNT 5 against MARILYNN REYNOLDS is DISMISSED with prejudice; COUNT 6 against SERGEANT ETHERTON is DISMISSED without prejudice; and COUNT 7 against MARILYNN RENYOLDS and SERGEANT ETHERTON is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to TERMINATE C/O BAKER, C/O BAXTER, and SERGEANT ETHERTON as parties in CM/ECF. Because these claims pertain to medical issues, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to ENTER the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/7/2021. (jsy) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #12 ) with respect to the remaining balance of the $350.00 filing fee ($325.26). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/17/2021. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Scott D Kizior. (kare) |
Filing 11 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 24.74 received, receipt number 34625107191 (clt) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Scott D Kizior. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $24.74 within FOURTEEN DAYS of the entry of this Order (on or before March 23, 2021). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a blank Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP form along with a copy of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not comply with this Order in the time allotted, this case will be dismissed for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due on or before 3/23/2021). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/9/2021. (tjk) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Scott D Kizior (kare) |
Filing 8 NOTICE Regarding TFS by Scott D Kizior (kare) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (kare) Modified on 3/8/2021 (kare). |
Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. #2 ), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 8/1/2020 to 2/19/2021 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at Williamson County Jail. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 4/8/2021). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/22/2021. (tjk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 02/19/2021. Consent due by 3/12/2021 (kare) |
Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 21-196-JPG. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/19/2021. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Scott D Kizior. (kare) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Scott D Kizior.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.