Woodward v. Lewis et al
| Sandy Woodward |
| Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC, Duane Lewis, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and RCM Logistics Inc |
| 3:2021cv00220 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-220-SMY. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #23 Notice (Other) filed by Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Duane Lewis. Incorrect filing event used. Filer should have used the event "Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge" located under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents, which would have placed the document under seal. Docket text and document security have been modified accordingly. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 23 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties (Hofer, Scott) Modified on 3/18/2021 (kek). |
| Filing 22 ANSWER TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES re #21 by All Plaintiffs. (Glisson, Michael) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #19 Amended Complaint by Duane Lewis, Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P..(Hofer, Scott) |
| Filing 20 Summons Issued as to RCM Logistics Inc and original mailed to Attorney Glisson. (kek) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs.(Glisson, Michael) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #16 Amended Complaint filed by Sandy Woodward. Login credentials used and signature on document do not match. Document is signed by Attorney Chartrand and is filed by Attorney Glisson. Amended Complaint should be re-filed using the appropriate credentials. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 17 Summons Requested. (Glisson, Michael) |
| Set Deadlines: Duane Lewis answer due 3/12/2021; Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC answer due 3/12/2021; Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. answer due 3/12/2021. (kek) |
| Filing 16 STRICKEN - AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs.(Glisson, Michael) Modified on 3/8/2021 (kek). |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #10 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants request additional time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading to Plaintiff's second amended complaint on or before March 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 3/5/2021. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff shall file her second amended complaint instanter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 3/5/2021. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Attorney Robert H. Houske. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Robert H. Houske $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-4419627 by on behalf of All Defendants. (Houske, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #8 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Sandy Woodward. Document attached is a proposed Second Amended Complaint. Proposed documents are not to be filed, rather should be submitted via email to the assigned Judge. Document should be sent by email accordingly. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time RE. Doc. 8 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint by All Defendants. (Hofer, Scott) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Chartrand, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Chartrand, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J Chartrand on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Chartrand, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Glisson, Sr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Glisson, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Sandy Woodward, Duane Lewis, Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC, and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-220-MAB. Consent due by 3/17/2021 (kek) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC. (Hofer, Scott) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. identifying Other Affiliate Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Other Affiliate PTL GP, LLC, Other Affiliate LJ VP Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Other Affiliate MBK USA Commercial Vehicles, Inc., Other Affiliate Penske Corporation, Other Affiliate Mitsui & Co., Ltd. for Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.. (Hofer, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott D. Hofer on behalf of All Defendants (Hofer, Scott) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Twentieth Circuit Court St. Clair County, Illinois, case number 20-L-0885 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4411591), filed by Opulence Nation Logistics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint Exhibit A - Complaint and Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Police Report (redacted), #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - IL SOS - Penske, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet - Attorneys)(Hofer, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
