Ramos v. Casey's General Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mark Ramos
Defendant: EBONY SUNKINS and Casey's General Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00227
Filed: February 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Staci M Yandle
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-227-SMY. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 22, 2021 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Noeltner, Barry)
March 22, 2021 Filing 12 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Rich, Michelle)
March 22, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Noeltner, Barry)
March 16, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Remand by Mark Ramos. Responses due by 4/19/2021 (Rich, Michelle)
March 16, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina D. Cooksey on behalf of Mark Ramos (Cooksey, Kristina)
March 16, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle M. Rich on behalf of Mark Ramos (Rich, Michelle)
March 4, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany P. Warren on behalf of Casey's General Stores, Inc., Ebony Sunkins (Warren, Brittany)
March 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACTION. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Rich does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 1, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-227-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 3/22/2021 (trb)
February 26, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants.(Noeltner, Barry)
February 26, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by All Defendants. (Noeltner, Barry)
February 26, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry S. Noeltner on behalf of All Defendants (Noeltner, Barry)
February 26, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County, Illinois Circuit Court, case number 21-L-0101 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4414013), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Noeltner, Barry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. Casey's General Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Ramos
Represented By: Kristina D. Cooksey
Represented By: Thomas C. Rich
Represented By: Michelle M. Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EBONY SUNKINS
Represented By: Barry S. Noeltner
Represented By: Brittany P. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey's General Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Barry S. Noeltner
Represented By: Brittany P. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?