Madison County, Illinois v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
| Madison County, Illinois |
| Naheed T. Bashir, M.D. and McKinsey & Company, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00254 |
| March 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #7 Notice of Initial Magistrate Assignment, filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc. Naheed T. Bashir, M.D., Madison County, Illinois. Notice modified to remove Defendant Naheed T. Bashir, M.D. as he has not been served. Consent will be requested once an entry of appearance is filed. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Madison County, Illinois, McKinsey & Company, Inc.. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-254-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 3/25/2021 (amv) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel K. Ryan on behalf of McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Ryan, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark D. Bauman on behalf of McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Bauman, Mark) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Brodzik, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL to the Plaintiff from Madison County, case number 2021-L-139, filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc..(Brodzik, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James M. Brodzik on behalf of McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Brodzik, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, case number 2021-L-139 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4419194), filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Brodzik, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
