Schuster v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Michael Schuster |
Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance and Diane Wilson |
3:2021cv00338 |
March 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Gilbert C Sison |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 FINAL CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Price, Daniel) Modified on 4/28/2021 (trb). |
Filing 25 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Diane Wilson to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Diane Wilson on 4/27/21. Consent due by 5/18/2021 (ack) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. Responses due by 6/1/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Price, Daniel) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel R. Price on behalf of Diane Wilson (Price, Daniel) |
Filing 22 ORDER finding as moot #13 Motion to Dismiss. As Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on April 12, 2021 #17 , the Court finds the present motion to dismiss is now moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 4/13/2021. (mjf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 21 Summons Issued as to Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Diane Wilson. Original mailed to Attorney Edward Unsell. (tba) |
Filing 20 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #17 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Schuster. The docket text incorrectly listed who the Amended Complaint was against. The text has been updated to list the correct defendants. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (tba)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 19 Summons Requested. (Unsell, Edward) |
Filing 18 Summons Requested. (Unsell, Edward) |
Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Auto-Owners Insurance & Diane Wilson, filed by All Plaintiffs.(Unsell, Edward) Modified on 4/13/2021 (tba). |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff files the present motion within twenty-one days of Defendant's motion to dismiss; accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as a matter of course. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 4/9/2021. (mjf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 15 MOTION to Amend/Correct by All Plaintiffs. (Unsell, Edward) |
Filing 14 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-338-GCS. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (kls3)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Responses due by 5/10/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Price, Daniel) |
Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Price, Daniel) |
Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Price, Daniel) UNSEALED on 4/27/2021 (ack). |
Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Unsell, Edward) Unsealed on 4/7/2021 (kls3). |
Filing 9 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #8 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form is 4/20/21.(trb) |
Filing 8 ENTRY STRICKEN: CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Unsell, Edward) Modified on 4/1/2021 (trb). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W. Unsell on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Unsell, Edward) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACTION See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Unsell does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-338-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 4/20/2021 (trb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Auto-Owners Insurance Company Notice to Plaintiff of Notice of Removal (Price, Daniel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel R. Price on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Price, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Price, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, case number 21:CH-000039 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4440080), filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Price, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.