Reubel Adventures, Inc. D/B/A Aeries Cottages v. Philadelphia Insurance Co.
Reubel Adventures, Inc. D/B/A Aeries Cottages and Reubel Adventures, Inc. doing business as Aerie's Cottages |
Philadelphia Insurance Co. |
3:2021cv00454 |
May 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss filed by Philadelphia Insurance Co.. (Kenny, Patrick) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick J. Kenny on behalf of Philadelphia Insurance Co. (Kenny, Patrick) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Reubel Adventures, Inc.. (Young, Matthew) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Stephen P. McGlynn for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-454-SPM. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Carlson, Sarah) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Philadelphia Insurance Co.. Responses due by 6/14/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Carlson, Sarah) |
Filing 8 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. NOTICE to Reubel Adventures, Inc. STRIKING PLEADING: : The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form is 5/27/2021.(clt) |
Filing 7 STRICKEN. CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Young, Matthew) Modified on 5/12/2021 (clt). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew P. Young on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Young, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E.S. Carlson on behalf of Philadelphia Insurance Co. (Carlson, Sarah) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION: See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorneys Young and Carlson do not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Philadelphia Insurance Co., Reubel Adventures, Inc. D/B/A Aeries Cottages. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-454-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 5/27/2021 (amv) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Philadelphia Insurance Co. identifying Corporate Parent Tokio Marine North America, Inc. for Philadelphia Insurance Co.. (Carlson, Sarah) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit Jersey County, Illinois, case number 20-L-8 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4472012), filed by Philadelphia Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, Part 1 - State Case, #3 Exhibit 1, part 2 - State Case)(Carlson, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.