Motter v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Georgia Motter |
Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Women's Health, Inc., Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. doing business as Teva Women's Health, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Coopersurgical, Inc., Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a division of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. doing business as Teva Women's Health, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
3:2021cv00486 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Bruce D. Taubman on behalf of Georgia Motter. (ack)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Bruce D. Taubman $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-4480825 by on behalf of Georgia Motter. (Taubman, Bruce) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 21-486-NJR. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (ack) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Georgia Motter against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4479800.), filed by Georgia Motter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taubman, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.