USA v. Center Ethanol Company, LLC
United States of America and USA |
Center Ethanol Company, LLC |
3:2021cv01115 |
September 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Environmental Matters |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Decree) (drr) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by USA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of the United States' Motion to Enter Consent Decree)(Ricci, Samantha) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Morgan Ricci on behalf of USA (Ricci, Samantha) |
Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-01115-NJR. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (clt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by United States of America re #1 Complaint Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree)(Ricci, Samantha) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Center Ethanol Company, LLC, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ricci, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.