Hollins v. Monti et al
Dwayne Hollins |
Daniel Monti, Ms. Johnston and Dr. David |
3:2021cv01143 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned District Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (kare) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Hollins to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Hollins on 9/15/2021. Consent due by 10/6/2021 (tjk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Dwayne Hollins. (tjk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwayne Hollins. (tjk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. David, Johnston, Daniel Monti, filed by Dwayne Hollins.(tjk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.