Walls v. Jeffreys et al
Nirin Walls |
Rob Jeffreys, Lana Nalewajka, John/Jane Doe, Doctor Shah, Jodi A. Pelegrin, Gary Reagan and Sherry Benton |
3:2021cv01369 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Nirin Walls. (jaj) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to 6 Order filed by Nirin Walls. (jaj) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Walls to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Walls on 11/1/2021. Consent due by 11/22/2021 (tjk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Nirin Walls. (tjk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nirin Walls. (tjk) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nirin Walls.(tjk) |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.