Howard v. City of Wood River et al
| Sheena Howard |
| City of Wood River, Michael Young, John Hoefert and Dennis Laboray |
| 3:2021cv01598 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to City of Wood River, John Hoefert, Dennis Laboray, Michael Young. Originals mailed to Attorney Matthew Paul Prengaman. (tba) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Paul Prengaman on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Prengaman, Matthew) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Prengaman on behalf of Sheena Howard. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert assigned. All future documents must bear case number 21-1598-JPG. (kdw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Matthew Paul Prengaman $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4651265 by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Prengaman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4651246.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Prengaman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
