USA v. Pharmacia LLC et al
USA |
Pharmacia LLC, Monsanto Co. and Solutia Inc |
3:2021cv01681 |
December 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
David W Dugan |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. § 9607 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT DECREE. The Consent Decree approved and signed by the undersigned includes Appendices A through E on file as attachments to the Notice of Settlement (Doc. 2). Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/2/2022. (arm) |
|
Filing 7 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by USA. (Zoeller, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-1681-DWD. (tba)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason A. Flower on behalf of All Defendants (Flower, Jason) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Zoeller, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: USA. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-1681-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 1/4/2022 (lmb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Settlement by United States Environmental Protection Agency (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree, #2 Appendix A (List of Settling Non-Participating Parties), #3 Appendix B (Site Map), #4 Appendix C (Record of Decision), #5 Appendix D (Statement of Work), #6 Appendix E (Signatures of Settling Non-Performing Parties))(Zoeller, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by United States Environmental Protection Agency. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zoeller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.