USA v. $36,504.72 in United States Funds Seized from Commerce Bank et al
| USA |
| $36,504.72 in United States Funds Seized from Commerce Bank, $7,600.00 in United States Currency and $36,504.72 in United States Funds Seized from Commerce Bank Account 2690 |
| 3:2022cv00023 |
| January 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Civil Forfeiture by USA. (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Forfeiture against $36,504.72 in United States Funds Seized from Commerce Bank Account 7601, $7,600.00 in United States Currency, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-23-SMY. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (kls3) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam E. Hanna on behalf of USA (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture against $36,504.72 in United States Funds Seized from Commerce Bank, $7,600.00 in United States Currency, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Civil cover sheet)(Hanna, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.