Anderson v. Social Security
Melissa L Anderson |
Commissioner Social Security |
SSAOGC |
3:2022cv00036 |
January 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Originals mailed to Attorney Donald Green. (jlh) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melissa L. Anderson. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/11/2022. (drr) |
Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-36-NJR. (jlh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald R. Green, Jr on behalf of Melissa L Anderson (Green, Donald) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melissa L Anderson. (Green, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security, filed by Melissa L Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Civil Process Clerk, #3 Summons Summons to General Counsel, #4 Summons Summons to Attorney General, #5 Consent to Magistrate Judge Consent to Magistrate Judge)(Green, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.