Valdez-Lamont v. Brookhart et al
| Jordan Valdez-Lamont |
| Deanna Brookhart, David A. Hylla, Richard L Tognarelli and Neil T Schroeder |
| 3:2022cv00286 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (kare) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (kare) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking 8 Notice Terminating Judge Assignment. Incorrect event used. (jlrr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 10 Case reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle per Order of Recusal. (jlrr) |
| Filing 8 STRICKEN-NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Judge David W. Dugan is no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 22-286-SMY. (kare) Modified on 3/31/2022 (jlrr). |
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge David W. Dugan recused. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign this case by random draw. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 3/29/2022. (sth)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Hearing by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (kare) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for the Court to Take Notice by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (kare) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Correct by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (kare) |
| Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 34625111852 (jlh) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT rescanned pages 5 and 6 of part 2 by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. Exhibit to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (kare) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Your case number is 22-286-DWD. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $5.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/18/2022. (jaj)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jordan Valdez-Lamont. (Attachments: #1 part 2, #2 part 3, #3 part 4)(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
