St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish v. Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC
| St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish |
| Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00473 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of its Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss St. Kateri Tekakwitha Parishs Complaint by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. (Jones, Katherine) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss St. Kateri Tekakwitha Parish's Complaint filed by St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Meirink, Melissa) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa C. Meirink on behalf of St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish (Meirink, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura E. Craft-Schrick on behalf of St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish (Craft-Schrick, Laura) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty recused. Case reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 3/16/2022. (jmj)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss St. Kateri Tekakwitha Parish's Complaint filed by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Jones, Katherine) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss St. Kateri Tekakwitha Parish's Complaint by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. (Jones, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #2 Notice (Other) filed by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. Incorrect event selected. Text entry modified to reflect the attached document is an Exhibit to the Complaint. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (kls3)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC and St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-473-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 3/29/2022.(kls3) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John McCorry on behalf of Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC (McCorry, John) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. (Jones, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine A. Jones on behalf of Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC (Jones, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT to #1 Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet (Jones, Katherine) Modified on 3/8/2022 (kls3). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Gallatin County, Illinois, case number 2022-LA-1 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4726599), filed by Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Jones, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish v. Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: St. Kateri Tekawitha Parish | |
| Represented By: | Melissa C. Meirink |
| Represented By: | Laura E. Craft-Schrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cram and Ferguson Architects, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John McCorry |
| Represented By: | Katherine A. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
