Bryant v. Butler et al
Plaintiff: Winford Bryant
Defendant: Kim Butler, Barack Obama and Nigel Patrick
Case Number: 3:2022cv00657
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Stephen P McGlynn
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for status by Winford Bryant. (kare)
May 16, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Winford Bryant from Lawrence CC to Shawnee CC. (jaj)
April 29, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration (Petition for Rehearing) re #8 Clerk's Judgment, #7 Order Dismissing case as Frivolous by Winford Bryant. (jaj)
April 5, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 4/5/2022. (tjk)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). This dismissal shall count as a "strike" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Bryant shall pay the $402.00 filing fee. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. (Doc. #2 , #4 ). The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 4/5/2022. (jrj)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 22-657-SPM. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 3/31/2022. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 3/31/2022. Consent due by 4/21/2022 (jaj)
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Winford Bryant. (jaj)
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Winford Bryant. (jaj)
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Winford Bryant. (jaj)
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Winford Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryant v. Butler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Winford Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barack Obama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nigel Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?