Williams v. Spiller et al
| Willie E. Williams |
| William A. Spiller, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Jason N. Hart, Anthony Wills, Sarah Johnson, Rob Jeffreys, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 |
| 3:2022cv00756 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Willie E. Williams.(kare) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #10 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Willie E. Williams. Motion filed in incorrect case; motion will be re-docketed in appropriate case. (mar)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 12 Letter from Willie Williams. (mar) |
Filing 11
ORDER: Per the Court's May 16, 2022 Order, Plaintiff was directed to submit an amended complaint in this matter because his original complaint concerning prison disciplinary proceedings failed to state a claim. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due by June 15, 2022. In the interim, Plaintiff submitted a "motion" concerning the forced administration of saliva tests at Menard Correctional Center. #10 . The allegations in the motion are unrelated to the original complaint, and even if they were related, the allegations in Plaintiff's motion are not sufficient to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. 1915A because Plaintiff does not clearly describe the personal involvement of any individual actors whom he alleges have violated his rights. At most, the Motion asks that a judge of this Court contact the Warden at Menard to stop saliva testing. There is no clear basis for this Court to do so, and the request is not related to any underlying lawsuit. Accordingly, this motion is not sufficient to either serve as an amended complaint, or to secure any relief in this case. Plaintiff's Motion #10 is DENIED. Plaintiff still has until June 15, 2022, to file a proper amended complaint, failing which his case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 6/1/2022. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 STRICKEN AT DOC 13 - MOTION by Willie E. Williams. (kare) Modified on 6/6/2022 (mar). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT: The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days of this Order. To assist him with preparing an amended complaint, the Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the standard civil rights complaint form along with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, his case may be dismissed for failure to state a claim or failure to prosecute. #2 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Willie E. Williams is DENIED. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/16/2022. (dsw)
|
| Filing 8 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 10.37 received, receipt number 34625112567 (jlh) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #3 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.37. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Lawrence Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/3/2022. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Willie E. Williams to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Willie E. Williams on 04/19/2022. Consent due by 5/10/2022 (kare) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 22-756-DWD. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/19/2022. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Willie E. Williams. (kare) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Willie E. Williams. (kare) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Willie E. Williams.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
