Nathan v. Lawrence Correctional Center et al
| Kevin Nathan |
| Lawrence Correctional Center, Wexford Health Services, F. Ahmed, V. Shah and Laura Cunningham |
| 3:2022cv00806 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER. Because this case was administratively closed on April 25, 2022 (Doc. 4), the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/17/2022. (ksp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Nathan. (kare) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. This case was opened upon receipt of a Complaint from Plaintiff Kevin Nathan for filing in this District (Doc. 1). Upon review of the Complaint, it is clear that the Complaint should be filed as an Amended Complaint in SDIL Case No. 3:21-cv-00597-DWD. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case without the assessment of a filing fee and FILE the Complaint as an Amended Complaint in SDIL Case No. 3:21-cv-00597-DWD. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/25/2022. (ksp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Kevin Nathan to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Kevin Nathan on 04/22/2022. Consent due by 5/13/2022 (kare) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Complaint. Your case number is 22-806-SMY. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $402.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/22/2022. (kare)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kevin Nathan.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
