Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Richard W Reed |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2022cv00885 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. Original sent to requesting party. (clt) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 5/9/2022. (kss)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-00885-NJR. (clt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard W Reed. (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T. Marvin on behalf of Richard W Reed (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Richard W Reed. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
