DeJong v. Pembrook et al
Plaintiff: Maggie R. DeJong
Defendant: Randall Pembrook, Jamie Ball and Megan A. Robb
Case Number: 3:2022cv01124
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Doc. #15 ). Defendants shall have a thirty (30) day extension, up to and including August 4, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/6/2022. (drr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 6, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Nash on behalf of All Defendants (Nash, Katherine)
July 6, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Cooper, Ian)
July 6, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian P. Cooper on behalf of Jamie Ball, Randall Pembrook, Megan A. Robb (Cooper, Ian)
June 21, 2022 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maggie R. DeJong. Jamie Ball served on 6/14/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Walters, Greggory)
June 17, 2022 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maggie R. DeJong. Megan A. Robb served on 6/13/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Walters, Greggory)
June 17, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #10 Return of Service Executed filed by Maggie R. DeJong. Incorrect event select. Efiler is instructed to refile using Civil>Service of Process>Summons Returned Executed. By selecting this event, the system will generate an answer due for the served defendant. (jlrr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 16, 2022 Filing 10 STRICKEN-RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED by Maggie R. DeJong on 06.13.2022. (Walters, Greggory) Modified on 6/17/2022 (jlrr).
June 6, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Cork on behalf of Maggie R. DeJong (Cork, Michael)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mathew W. Hoffmann; granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tyson C. Langhofer. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 3, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Greggory R. Walters on behalf of Maggie R. DeJong (Walters, Greggory)
June 3, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tyson C. Langhofer $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4801072 by on behalf of Maggie R. DeJong. (Langhofer, Tyson)
June 3, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mathew W. Hoffmann $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4801040 by on behalf of Maggie R. DeJong. (Hoffmann, Mathew)
June 1, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jamie Ball, Randall Pembrook, Megan A. Robb. Originals mailed to Greggory R. Walters. (adh)
June 1, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-1124-NJR. (adh)
May 31, 2022 Filing 2 EXHIBIT by Maggie R. DeJong. Exhibit to #1 Complaint,,, . (Walters, Greggory)
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4797596.), filed by Maggie R. DeJong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CoverSheet, #2 Summons Megan A. Robb, #3 Summons Jamie Ball, #4 Summons Randall G. Pembrook, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5, #10 Exhibit 6, #11 Exhibit 7, #12 Exhibit 8, #13 Exhibit 9, #14 Exhibit 10, #15 Exhibit 11, #16 Exhibit 12, #17 Exhibit 13, #18 Exhibit 14, #19 Exhibit 15A, #20 Exhibit 15B, #21 Exhibit 15C, #22 Exhibit 15D, #23 Exhibit 16, #24 Exhibit 17, #25 Exhibit 18, #26 Exhibit 19A, #27 Exhibit 19B, #28 Exhibit 20A, #29 Exhibit 20B)(Walters, Greggory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeJong v. Pembrook et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maggie R. DeJong
Represented By: Greggory R. Walters
Represented By: Mathew W. Hoffmann
Represented By: Michael J. Cork
Represented By: Tyson C. Langhofer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randall Pembrook
Represented By: Ian P. Cooper
Represented By: Katherine L. Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamie Ball
Represented By: Ian P. Cooper
Represented By: Katherine L. Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Megan A. Robb
Represented By: Ian P. Cooper
Represented By: Katherine L. Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?