England v. Chicago Alternative Health Center, LLC
Plaintiff: Tomi England
Defendant: Chicago Alternative Health center, LLC d/b/a Ascend Cannabis and Chicago Alternative Health Center, LLC doing business as Ascend Cannabis
Case Number: 3:2022cv01254
Filed: June 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Staci M Yandle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 22-1254-SMY. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 20, 2022 Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kennedy, Melvin)
July 6, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. Notice to Attorney Kennedy: The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. Your signature was absent from the form. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Please refile completed document. Another form is attached to this notice. (csb)
July 6, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucy Bednarek on behalf of All Defendants (Bednarek, Lucy)
July 5, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tomi England. Chicago Alternative Health Center, LLC waiver sent on 7/5/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Kennedy, Melvin)
July 5, 2022 Filing 7 STRICKEN CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kennedy, Melvin) Modified on 7/6/2022 (csb).
June 29, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Cyrus Dashtaki on behalf of Tomi England (Dashtaki, Cyrus)
June 14, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chicago Alternative Health center, LLC d/b/a Ascend Cannabis. Original mailed to counsel for service. (amv)
June 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Tomi England. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 22-1254-RJD. Consent due by 7/5/2022 (amv)
June 13, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Requested. (Kennedy, Melvin)
June 13, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Melvin D. Kennedy on behalf of Tomi England (Kennedy, Melvin)
June 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chicago Alternative Health center, LLC d/b/a Ascend Cannabis ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4808076.), filed by Tomi England. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Discrimination Charge, #2 Exhibit Discrimination Charge, #3 Exhibit Notice of Rights Letter, #4 Exhibit Notice of Rights Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kennedy, Melvin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: England v. Chicago Alternative Health Center, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomi England
Represented By: Melvin D. Kennedy
Represented By: Cyrus Dashtaki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Alternative Health center, LLC d/b/a Ascend Cannabis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Alternative Health Center, LLC doing business as Ascend Cannabis
Represented By: Lucy Bednarek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?