Jackson v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC
| Jamie Jackson |
| Dole Packaged Foods, LLC |
| 3:2022cv01448 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Itochu for Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
Filing 27
ORDER. Scheduling Conference set for 9/28/2022 at 3:00 PM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. The Parties will receive the appropriate Zoom invitation via email from the Court. The Joint Report of the Parties is due on or before 9/21/2022 and shall be submitted via email to DWDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. The Parties are instructed to use the correct form for the Joint Report of the Parties which can be found attached to this Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 JROP)(dmw2)
|
| Filing 26 CJRA TRACK D assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/3/2024 at 10:00 AM and Bench Trial set for 7/15/2024 at 9:00 AM both in the East St. Louis Courthouse before Judge David W. Dugan. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/26/2022. (dmw2) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER: In reviewing the docket, it appears that Defendant Dole Packaged Foods, LLC has not filed a corporate disclosure statement as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. Defendant shall file a corporate disclosure statement by September 1, 2022. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/25/2022. (dsw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 24 AFFIDAVIT re #22 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, #23 Memorandum in Support of Motion DECLARATION OF SARAH L. BREW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 21 Sealed Document Defendant's Sealed Notice of Removal re 18 Order on Motion to Seal,,,,,,, by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration)(Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Blake Mattingly on behalf of Jamie Jackson (Mattingly, Blake) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart L. Cochran on behalf of Jamie Jackson (Cochran, Stuart) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Seal: Defendant Dole Packaged Foods, LLC (Dole) removed this case on July 2, 2022. The removal papers have redacted the dollar amount of sales of the Fruit Bowl products at issue in in this lawsuit. Dole has only redacted the dollar amount of sales, leaving the rest of the papers available for public viewing. Dole now moves to keep that information confidential and seeks leave to file unredacted versions of its Notice of Removal and the Declaration of Brian Thomas in support thereof under seal (Doc. #2 ). Dole contends that the redacted portions of the subject pleadings contain highly confidential sales figures which, if publicly disclosed, could cause harm to Dole. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Judicial proceedings leading to a final decision and materials on which a judicial decision rests are presumptively in the public domain. There are exceptions, however, to the general rule of access to court documents. For example, courts have sealed records or portions of them to prevent court files from serv[ing] as reservoirs of libelous statements for press consumption or to protect business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) (citations omitted). This includes records that reveal consumer and pricing data. See KM Enters., Inc. v. Glob. Traffic Techs., Inc., 725 F.3d 718, 734 (7th Cir. 2013). Having reviewed Doles motion, the Court finds that good cause exists to seal the proprietary information and that the request is narrow and specific. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. Dole may file unredacted versions of the Notice of Removal and of the Thomas declaration under seal. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 7/26/2022. (dsw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Collins on behalf of defendant Dole Packaged Foods, LLC.(kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Rory F. Collins $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4837825 by on behalf of Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Collins, Rory) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 22-1448-DWD. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Young on behalf of defendant Dole Package Foods, LLC. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 13 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Armstrong, Matthew) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Brew on behalf of defendant Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tyler Young $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4835947 by on behalf of Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Young, Tyler) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Sarah Brew $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4835308 by on behalf of Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Brew, Sarah) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may file a motion to dismiss up to and including August 8, 2022. Plaintiff may file a response to that motion up to and including September 7, 2022. Defendant may then file a reply to that response up to and including September 21, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 7/15/2022. (mjf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint and Set Briefing Schedule (AGREED) by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Nelson on behalf of Jamie Jackson (Nelson, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew H. Armstrong on behalf of Jamie Jackson (Armstrong, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ruben I. Gonzalez on behalf of Dole Packaged Foods, LLC (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney McNelley does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, Jamie Jackson. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 22-1448-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 7/29/2022 (kdw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Seal by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Gonzalez, Ruben) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 20th Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, case number 22LA0022 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4826701), filed by Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Brian Thomas in Support of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Gonzalez, Ruben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
