Cope v. Dollar General Stores, LLC et al
Sandra Cope |
DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager, Dollar General Stores, LLC and Tracy Malson |
3:2022cv01524 |
July 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 23 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 22 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 21 NOTICE: Sandra Cope, DG Retail, LLC was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Sandra Cope, DG Retail, LLC shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 8/15/2022 (amv) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE to #18 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Sandra Cope. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 19 Defendant's ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by DG Retail, LLC.(Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by DG Retail, LLC. (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Cope. DG Retail, LLC served on 6/17/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 16 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #12 Notice of Appearance filed by Sandra Cope and #13 Notice of Appearance filed by Sandra Cope. Documents were filed incorrectly. Filer has refiled documents correctly. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Cope. Dollar General Stores, LLC served on 6/17/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew S. Buchanan on behalf of Sandra Cope (Buchanan, Andrew) |
Filing 13 STRICKEN NOTICE of Appearance by James V. O'Brien on behalf of Sandra Cope (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 12 STRICKEN NOTICE of Appearance by James V. O'Brien on behalf of Sandra Cope (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James V. O'Brien on behalf of Sandra Cope (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF ACTION:. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney O'Brien does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (amv) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Sandra Cope. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Sandra Cope. (O'Brien, James) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DG Retail, LLC, Dollar General Stores, LLC, Tracy Malson, filed by Sandra Cope.(O'Brien, James) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Sandra Cope, DG Retail, LLC, John Doe. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 22-cv-1524-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 8/5/2022 (kek) |
Filing 5 Defendants, DG Retail LLC and John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager's ANSWER to Complaint by DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager.(Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager. (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager. (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey A. Kopis on behalf of DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager (Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, case number 2022-LA-0684, filed by DG Retail, LLC, John Doe, Dollar General Store Manager. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kopis, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.