Ware v. Impact Fulfillment Services
Eureka Ware |
Impact Fulfillment Services |
3:2022cv01585 |
July 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Acknowledgement letter from Clerk, Madison County Circuit Court. (kls3) |
Filing 16 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #15 Letter. See attached document for specifics. Order of remand already processed. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 15 STRICKEN Letter to Madison County Circuit Clerk regarding Order of Remand (amv) |
Filing 14 Letter to Clerk, Madison County Circuit Court attaching certified copy of Order of Remand filed at Doc. 13. (kls3) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan J. Mahoney on behalf of Eureka Ware (Mahoney, Ryan) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Impact Fulfillment Services. (Zoia, Mallory) |
Set/Reset Deadlines. Defendant's response due by 8/26/2022 (jlh) |
Set Deadlines: Supplemental Statement due by 7/27/2022 regarding Order at Doc 7. (kek) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Impact Fulfillment Services re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Removal to State Court-Executed (Zoia, Mallory) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-cv-1585-NJR. (kek) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Jean Kuehnel on behalf of Impact Fulfillment Services (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Impact Fulfillment Services identifying Corporate Parent IFS Holdings, LLC for Impact Fulfillment Services. (Zoia, Mallory) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Impact Fulfillment Services Notice of Removal to Plaintiff (Zoia, Mallory) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mallory Stumpf Zoia on behalf of Impact Fulfillment Services (Zoia, Mallory) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, case number 2022LA000742 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4837174), filed by Impact Fulfillment Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Angela Mendes, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zoia, Mallory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ware v. Impact Fulfillment Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eureka Ware | |
Represented By: | David I. Cates |
Represented By: | Ryan J. Mahoney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Impact Fulfillment Services | |
Represented By: | Sarah Jean Kuehnel |
Represented By: | Mallory Stumpf Zoia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.