Hughes v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patricia Hughes
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv01661
Filed: July 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mark A Beatty
Referring Judge: Staci M Yandle
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting #13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Stephanie B. Weirick on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc..(adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting #12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Michael David Daneker on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc..(adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Granting #11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kenneth L. Chernof on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc..(adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 21, 2022 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Honeywell International, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Honeywell International, Inc. for Honeywell International, Inc.. (Galvin, John)
September 21, 2022 Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Honeywell International, Inc.. (Galvin, John)
September 21, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by John E. Galvin on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc. (Galvin, John)
September 21, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Stephanie B. Weirick $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4888900 by on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc.. (Weirick, Stephanie)
September 21, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Michael David Daneker $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4888885 by on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc.. (Daneker, Michael)
September 21, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kenneth L. Chernof $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4888853 by on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc.. (Chernof, Kenneth)
August 5, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Patricia Hughes. Honeywell International, Inc. waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Lange, Nicholas)
August 5, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas R. Lange on behalf of Patricia Hughes (Lange, Nicholas)
July 29, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #7 Notice (Other) filed by Patricia Hughes. Incorrect filing event used. Filer should have used the event "Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge" located under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents, which would have placed the filing under seal. Docket text and document security have been modified accordingly and no further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 29, 2022 Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties (Clayborne, James) Modified on 7/29/2022 (kek).
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte for the purpose of case management. On July 26, 2022, this case was filed in this District Court and randomly assigned to the undersigned. It has been determined that this case is closely related to Steward v. Honeywell Intl, Inc., SDIL Case No. 18-CV-1124-SMY, which is assigned to District Judge Staci M. Yandle, and should be handled by a single judge in order to promote judicial economy and efficiency and avoid the unnecessary duplication of efforts. See, e.g. Smith v. Check-N-Go of Illinois, Inc., 200 F.3d 511, 513 n.1 (7th Cir. 1999); Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc. , 181 F.3d 832, 839 (7th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to REASSIGN this case to District Judge Staci M. Yandle. All future documents filed in this matter shall bear the case number 22-cv-1661-SMY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 7/28/2022. (dkd)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 27, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Clayborne, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Clayborne, James)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David R. Barney, Jr. $200 fee paid, receipt number AILSDC-4843046 on behalf of Patricia Hughes (jlh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 26, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David R. Barney, Jr $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4843046 by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Barney, David)
July 26, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Patricia Hughes. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 22-cv-1661-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 8/16/2022 (jlh)
July 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4842486.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clayborne, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Hughes
Represented By: David R. Barney, Jr.
Represented By: James F. Clayborne, Jr.
Represented By: Nicholas R. Lange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Represented By: John E. Galvin
Represented By: Stephanie B. Weirick
Represented By: Kenneth L. Chernof
Represented By: Michael David Daneker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?