Palmeros-Vela v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Case Number: 3:2022cv01882
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Stephen P McGlynn
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Defendant's brief due within 30 days after filing of plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff brief due by 10/17/2022. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 9/15/2022. (lmb)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SUBMISSION OF TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record. filed by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit)(Wyatt, Nathan)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Wyatt, Nathan)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Atty General 8/31/22)(Pavisian, James)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/29/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served US Atty 8/29/22)(Pavisian, James)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE - All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Nonetheless, to maintain an equalized docket and to foster efficiency, this action will not be referred to a magistrate judge at this time. See Administrative Order No. 293. Accordingly, until further notice, this case will remain with the assigned district judge. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINAL CONSENT TO TRIAL BY U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Pavisian, James) Modified on 9/7/2022 (lmb).
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. Original summons mailed to Attorney Pavisian. (lmb)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Requested. (Pavisian, James)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: A court may permit a plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis where the plaintiff has demonstrated indigence. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Nevertheless, a court can dismiss a qualified plaintiff's case if the action is clearly frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court finds that Plaintiff's affidavit demonstrates indigence. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, in Plaintiff's Complaint, she states that she seeks review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration as permitted under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Accordingly, the Court finds nothing in the file to indicate that this action is frivolous or malicious. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 8/23/2022. (anb2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Stephen P. McGlynn assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-1882-SPM. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (lmb)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Pavisian on behalf of Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela (Pavisian, James)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela. (Pavisian, James)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pavisian, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palmeros-Vela v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elisha R. Palmeros-Vela
Represented By: James Pavisian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Nathan E. Wyatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSAOGC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?