Junker v. Mascoutah Community School District 19 et al
Plaintiff: Brooke Junker
Defendant: District 19 Mascoutah Community School District 19, Todd Gober and Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education
Case Number: 3:2022cv01962
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: David W Dugan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Westlaw)(Bruch, Julie)
October 19, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education. (Bruch, Julie)
October 13, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie A. Bruch on behalf of Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education (Bruch, Julie)
October 13, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence E. Neyland on behalf of Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education (Neyland, Lawrence)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER: Discovery due by 10/23/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 11/22/2023. Stipulation Selecting Mediator to be filed by 11/18/2022. Mandatory Mediation Session to be completed by 9/22/2023. Mandatory Mediation Program Completion due by 11/7/2023. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 JROP) (dmw2)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER. The Court adopts the Joint Report of the Parties as submitted. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2022 is CANCELLED. Should the parties seek to amend the trial date, a written motion will be required. A Status Conference is set for 11/28/2023 at 3:00 PM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/13/2022. (dmw2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/20/2022. (dmw2)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2022 at 3:30 PM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. The Parties will receive the appropriate Zoom invitation via email from the Court. The Joint Report of the Parties is due on or before 10/12/2022 and shall be submitted via email to DWDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. The Parties are instructed to use the correct form for the Joint Report of the Parties which can be found attached to this Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 JROP)(dmw2)
September 20, 2022 Filing 15 CJRA TRACK C assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/7/2024 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial set for 3/18/2024 at 9:00 AM both in the East St. Louis Courthouse before Judge David W. Dugan. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/20/2022. (dmw2)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER regarding Defendants' Motion for the Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Doc. #13 ). In support of their Motion, Defendants submit that they need additional time to review the pertinent records, research the relevant case law, and complete an investigation into the merits and factual allegations of the claims contained in Plaintiff's 10-count Complaint (Doc. #1 ). Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion and EXTENDS the time to answer Plaintiff's Complaint or to otherwise plead to October 19, 2022. (Defendants' Answer or Other Pleading due 10/19/2022). Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/19/2022. (jnh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 19, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education. (Neyland, Lawrence)
September 19, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence E. Neyland on behalf of Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education (Neyland, Lawrence)
September 19, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie A. Bruch on behalf of Todd Gober, Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education (Bruch, Julie)
September 9, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brooke Junker. Todd Gober served on 8/29/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. (Lorenz, Natalie)
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brooke Junker. Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education served on 8/29/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. (Lorenz, Natalie)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel recused. Case reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/25/2022. (drb)
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Todd Gober, District 19 Mascoutah Community School District 19. Original summons mailed to Attorney Lorenz. (lmb)
August 25, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-1962-NJR. (lmb)
August 25, 2022 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 30 (adh)
August 24, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Montana L Sinn on behalf of Brooke Junker (Sinn, Montana)
August 24, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Requested. (Lorenz, Natalie)
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Requested. (Lorenz, Natalie)
August 24, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie T. Lorenz on behalf of Brooke Junker (Lorenz, Natalie)
August 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Todd Gober, District 19 Mascoutah Community School District 19, filed by Brooke Junker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lorenz, Natalie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Junker v. Mascoutah Community School District 19 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Junker
Represented By: Montana L Sinn
Represented By: Natalie T. Lorenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District 19 Mascoutah Community School District 19
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Gober
Represented By: Julie A. Bruch
Represented By: Lawrence E. Neyland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mascoutah Community School District 19 Board of Education
Represented By: Julie A. Bruch
Represented By: Lawrence E. Neyland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?