Staley v. Pritzker et al
David James Staley |
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Jeffrey M. Dennison, David Mitchell, Shayne Mercier, Sherry Benton, Jessie Reid, Robert Samaliosk, Shawn Brown, Mikah Hallman and Derek Herman |
3:2022cv02028 |
August 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 4.50 received, receipt number 785. (adh) |
|
Filing 12 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
Filing 11 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 8/31/2022. Consent due by 9/21/2022 (kare) |
|
Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01824. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 8 TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Illinois, Benton Division. the original file certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet via certified mail number. (jh, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
Filing 7 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 8/29/2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
|
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff David James Staley for attorney representation. (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] Modified on 8/31/2022 (kare). Modified on 8/31/2022 (kare). |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff David James Staley for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] Modified on 8/31/2022 (kare). |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by David James Staley. (Exhibits, Envelope post marked 4/5/22) (nsf, ). [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to plaintiff. (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 8/31/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.