Coss v. Commissioner of Social Security
Kathy L. Coss |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSAOGC |
3:2022cv02151 |
September 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kathy L. Coss. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/14/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kathy L. Coss. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/17/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kathy L. Coss. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/11/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and original mailed to Attorney Marvin. (kek) |
|
Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-2151-NJR. (lmb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kathy L. Coss. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T. Marvin on behalf of Kathy L. Coss (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kathy L. Coss. (Attachments: #1 AC Decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.