Brown v. Tilden et al
| Marcus Brown |
| Andrew Tilden, Cheryle Hansen, Dr. Ritz, Dr. Siddiqui, Nurse Practitioner Moldenhauer and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv02372 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dr. Ritz on 12/9/22. Waiver of Service due by 1/8/2023. (adh)
|
|
Filing 19
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dr. Siddiqui on 12/9/22. Waiver of Service due by 1/8/2023. (adh)
|
|
Filing 18
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Nurse Practitioner Moldenhauer on 12/9/22. Waiver of Service due by 1/8/2023. (adh)
|
|
Filing 17
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Wexford Health Sources on 12/9/22. Waiver of Service due by 1/8/2023. (adh)
|
|
Filing 16
Order for Service of Process upon Dr. Ritz, Dr. Siddiqui, Moldenhauer, and Wexford Health Sources, Inc., DENYING #5 MOTION to Request Counsel filed by Marcus Brown. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/9/2022. (anp)
|
|
Filing 15
Letter from Marcus Brown (kare)
|
|
Filing 14
CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 11/9/2022 (kare)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 855 (clw)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Change of Address by Marcus Brown (kare)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing Fee due on or before 11/14/2022 (kare)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ). A federal court may permit an indigent party to proceed without pre-payment of fees. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). The Court is not satisfied from Brown's affidavit that he is indigent. Plaintiff's trust fund account balance as of May 4, 2022 was $651.33 (Doc. #4 ). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ). Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee no later than November 14, 2022. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/13/2022. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 10
This Court has received your complaint/petition (and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee) from the Central District of Illinois, previously assigned case number: 22-1167. Your new case number is 22-2372-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/12/2022. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 10/12/2022. Consent due by 11/2/2022 (jaj)
|
|
Filing 8
Case transferred in from District of Illinois Central; Case Number 1:22-cv-01167. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 7
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/11/2022. The Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss Defendants Dr. Tilden and Nurse Hansen. Based on the face of the complaint, the claims are barred by the two- year statute of limitations period. The Court finds that venue over Plaintiff's remaining claim against Menard Correctional Center Defendants Dr. Nurse Moldenhauer and Dr. Siddiqui; Wexford Dr. Ritz; and Wexford lies in the Southern District of Illinois, and that it is in the interests of justice that this cause be transferred there. See 28 U.S.C. Sec 1404(a). See written order. (KE) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Change of Address by Marcus Brown. New address is Lake County Jail, Waukegan, IL. (SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Marcus Brown. Responses due by 5/24/2022 (SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 4
+++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Marcus Brown (SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Marcus Brown.(SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 5/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Cheryle Hansen,. Moldenhauer,. Ritz,. Siddiqui, Andrew Tilden, Wexford Health Sources Inc, filed by Marcus Brown.(SAG) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/12/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
