Burchett v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rheanna Joy Burchett |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2022cv02948 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File the Certified Administrative Record is GRANTED. The Commissioner of Social Security now has until March 3, 2023, to file the certified administrative record. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 2/13/2023. (bceb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Certified Administrative Record by Commissioner of Social Security. (Godfrey, Jean) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Godfrey, Jean) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE - All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Nonetheless, to maintain an equalized docket and to foster efficiency, this action will not be referred to a magistrate judge at this time. See Administrative Order No. 293. Accordingly, until further notice, this case will remain with the assigned district judge. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Pavisian, James) Modified on 12/28/2022 (kdw). |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: A court may permit a plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis where the plaintiff has demonstrated indigence. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Nevertheless, a court can dismiss a qualified plaintiff's case if the action is clearly frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court finds that Plaintiff's affidavit demonstrates indigence. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, in Plaintiff's Complaint, she states that she seeks review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration as permitted under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Accordingly, the Court finds nothing in the file to indicate that this action is frivolous or malicious. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 12/21/2022. (anb2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Judge Stephen P. McGlynn assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 22-2948-SPM. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (kdw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Pavisian on behalf of Rheanna Joy Burchett (Pavisian, James) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rheanna Joy Burchett. (Pavisian, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Rheanna Joy Burchett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pavisian, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
