Pape v. Yoti (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff: O.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Allison Pape, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals and Allison Pape
Defendant: Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation and Yoti (USA) Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv03105
Filed: December 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Yoti (USA) Inc. (Doc. #13 ). Defendant may answer or otherwise plead on or before March 3, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/6/2023. (drr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 3, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Yoti (USA) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Liljestrand, Cameron)
January 9, 2023 Filing 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Yoti (USA) Inc.. (Liljestrand, Cameron)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Granting #10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Thomas M. Wolf $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4967266 filed by Yoti (USA) Inc.(aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 5, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Thomas M. Wolf $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4967266 by on behalf of Yoti (USA) Inc.. (Wolf, Thomas)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: A review of the record in this case indicates that Defendant has not filed its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 disclosure statement. Thus, the Court ALLOWS Defendant, up to and including January 11, 2023 to comply. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/4/2023. (drr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed (Doc. #3 ). Defendant may answer or otherwise plead on or before February 6, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/4/2023. (drr)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge J. Phil Gilbert recused. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/3/2023. (jdh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
December 29, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Patrick Kingsbury on behalf of Allison Pape (Kingsbury, Timothy)
December 29, 2022 Filing 5 Letter to Attorney Andrew Heldut regarding admission to SDIL. (aza)
December 29, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-03105-JPG. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (aza)
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Liljestrand, Cameron)
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron Liljestrand on behalf of Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation (Liljestrand, Cameron)
December 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Williamson County, case number 2022LA139 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4961966), filed by Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liljestrand, Cameron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pape v. Yoti (USA) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: O.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Allison Pape, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allison Pape
Represented By: Andrew T. Heldut
Represented By: Timothy Patrick Kingsbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Cameron Liljestrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yoti (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Thomas M. Wolf
Represented By: Cameron Liljestrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?