Batteau v. State of Texas
| Sara J. Batteau |
| Gregg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Texas Department of Family Protective Services, Amy Tucker, Mason Martin, Robert Trap, Jack Reilly, Christine Jonte, Lisa Bruce and State of Texas |
| 3:2022cv03147 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #2 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice; Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED; and Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense (Doc. #4 ) is TERMINATED as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 2/16/2023. (mah)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: This case has been reassigned to District Judge Staci M. Yandle. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-3147-SMY. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 This lawsuit relates to Case No. 22-3145-SMY. The other case was assigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle. Under the logic of Smith v. Check-n-Go of Illinois, 200 F.3d 511, 513 n.1 (7th Cir. 1999), this case should be reassigned to Judge Yandle. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby TRANSFERS this case (for reassignment by the Clerk's Office) to Judge Yandle. Parties should use the suffix "-SMY" in the case number of all future pleadings herein. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/26/2023. (dsw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (clw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Sara J. Batteau was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Sara J. Batteau shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 1/30/2023 (adh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Consent due by 1/30/2023 (adh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing All Parties to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to All Parties on 01/03/2023. Consent due by 1/20/2023 (clw) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Sara Batteau. (clw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sara Batteau. (clw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Pro Se Civil Rights against All Defendants, filed by Sara Batteau.(clw) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-CV-3147-DWD Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
