Lovell v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
Peter Marston Lovell |
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq00194 |
February 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/18/2022. (mlp) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Peter Marston Lovell (Anderson, Gary) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. Original mailed to counsel for service. (amv) |
Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-194-NJR. (mar) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory A. Cade on behalf of Peter Marston Lovell (Cade, Gregory) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4695540.), filed by Peter Marston Lovell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Syngenta Crop summons, #3 Summons Chevron USA summons)(Anderson, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.