Avilez v. Syngenta AG et al
Reymundo Avilez |
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Does 1 through 60 inclusive |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq00625 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reymundo Avilez. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC served on 4/11/2022, answer due 5/2/2022. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reymundo Avilez. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals mailed to requesting party. (clt) |
Filing 6 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Allen Smith, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Smith, Robert) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-625-NJR. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4743596.), filed by Reymundo Avilez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keyes, Madison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.