Cutshaw v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
Charles Cutshaw |
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP and Chevron USA, Inc. |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq00805 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to the Stipulation Regarding Proper Parties, Case Management No. 11, and Plaintiff's #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, Defendant Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 5/3/2022. (mlp) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Charles Cutshaw (Martin, Ben) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-805-NJR. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Charles Cutshaw against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4767775.), filed by Charles Cutshaw. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Ben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.