Jackson v. Syngenta AG et al
Darrell Jackson |
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Does 1 through 60, Inclusive and Chevron USA, Inc. |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq01063 |
May 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Reissued as to Chevron USA, Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals mailed to LaRuby May. (adh) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Darrell Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(May, LaRuby) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Syngenta AG and to Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals returned to Attorney May for service. (kls3) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-1063-NJR. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 60, Inclusive, Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4790511.), filed by Darrell Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(May, LaRuby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.