Hick v. Syngenta AG et al
Leanne Hick |
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 60 inclusive |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq01694 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Leanne Hick. Syngenta AG waiver sent on 9/15/2022, answer due 12/14/2022. (Shah, Tayjes) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leanne Hick. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. (Shah, Tayjes) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leanne Hick. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. (Shah, Tayjes) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals mailed to counsel for service. (amv) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-1694-NJR. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4844605.), filed by Leanne Hick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shah, Tayjes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.