Walsh v. Syngenta AG et al
| Thomas Walsh and Barbara Lefdal |
| Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron USA |
| Randi Ellis |
| 3:2022pq02157 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas Walsh, Barbara Lefdal. Chevron USA served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. (Henderson, Gibbs) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Thomas Walsh, Barbara Lefdal. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC waiver sent on 9/14/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Henderson, Gibbs) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Thomas Walsh, Barbara Lefdal. Syngenta AG waiver sent on 9/14/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Henderson, Gibbs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chevron USA. Original mailed to Gibbs Henderson (adh) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-2157-NJR. (jlrr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chevron USA, Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4882612.), filed by Thomas Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Henderson, Gibbs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
