Emery et al v. Syngenta AG et al
James Emery and Glenda Emery |
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Corporation and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq02254 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Emery, Glenda Emery. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Lyons, Patrick) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Emery, Glenda Emery. Syngenta Corporation served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Lyons, Patrick) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Syngenta AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. Original mailed to counsel for service. (amv) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-2254-NJR. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Syngenta AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4894384.), filed by James Emery, Glenda Emery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Syngenta AG, #3 Summons Syngenta Corporation, #4 Summons Syngenta Crop Protection LLC)(Lyons, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.